Minolta X700 Wide Angle

Susan Wiest at Wikipedia deleted

Here are some excerpts from the deletion debate. For the whole discussion goes here's .

Susan Wiest (deleted) [edit ]

This person does not seem to be sufficiently relevant to this encyclopedia. Also, this article does not correspond to the relevance criteria. - Jannosch 21:32, 16 Jan. 2011 (CET)

Bin for RESERVE. Whether Susan Wiest (You can delete it then still) has to be seen in 10 or 20 years to relevance. But currently she has no doubt relevant. The BGE idea is becoming more widely discussed and next Götz Werner Susan Wiest expected by their petition, the best known representative of this idea. Those who want to learn more about the subject will soon come to SW and then should also be find on Wikipedia .-- Doscho 00:27, 29 Jan. 2011 (CET)

I consider this person as relevant. since the hearing of their petition on 8 november 2010 in the Committee of the German Bundestag is their initiative and historically relevant, and an entry is essential. also: to improve contribution! (not signed post by Stinde ( discussion Encyclopedia. Who creates it as an individual to bring a petition through the jungle and a problem so effectively makes press, as opposed to "Star Collector" still be interesting in ten years. Keep - PG

16:35, 18 Jan. 2011 (CET)

should not be deleted. ( not signed

post by

188.101.69.66 (Talk ) 21:10, 23 January 2011 (PST))

because I can only connect - the article should not be deleted . Susan Wiest has achieved through its commitment to the basic income greater awareness and popularity; they also can be seen in two films: one is a portrait of her by Swiss filmmakers Enno Schmidt and Daniel Häni, and it works in the cinema documentary film "Nothing is better than nothing" with. In addition, all newspapers have reported it out without interviews with her, and she is always in radio interviews to be heard. - Exact Ness 09:06, 24 Jan. 2011 (CET) I agree too. The article should not be deleted. Susan Wiest was often in public television, where it has the idea of unconditional basic income represented. By petition to the parliament, it has achieved notoriety. ( not signed post by

bgenymous ( discussion relevant

. Susan Wiest is famous by the surprising success of your petition for a symbolic figure of the current discussion of the topic

Bedingungsloses_Grundeinkommen . Thus it is relevant and its function should be documented .-- Stywiz 14:22, 25 Jan. 2011 (CET) ... I forgot even Susan Wiest is represented on talk shows on BGE a welcome guest to 'the voice of the people'. The information needs to know "Who is that really ..." may therefore be accepted. - Stywiz 14:50, 25 Jan. 2011 (CET) [...]

Good arguments have been through the 'one-vote-account-people' had enough produced, so I limit myself as a long-standing taking notes on

Relevant reserve. - Cspan64 15:42, 27 Jan. 2011 (CET) The I join seamlessly to: retention. - ¸.·'¯`·.¸> Visie

15:57, 27 Jan. 2011 (CET)

In any case: Keep . Arguments have already been mentioned above in abundance. Auryn 15:59, 27 Jan. 2011 (CET) relevant Without question Keep

! -

teekoque 16:07, 27 Jan. 2011 (CET) Susan Wiest, even without a personality to Wikipedia historical. Plenty of arguments have already been mentioned. Why not delete the first, and then start all over again? In any case: Keep

! -

UlfZibis

16:34, 27 Jan. 2011 (CET)

Keep

. Relevance is demonstrated in articles, links and discussion. - JosFritz 16:52, 27 Keep Jan. 2011 (CET) <((^((º>

and extend best! ( not signed post by

212.23.103.49 (Talk ) 17:20, 27 January 2011 (PST))

Keep: "... because of their Participation in historical, political or otherwise newsworthy events known "(quote from the relevance criteria ) - would

Gebu

18:01, 27 January 2011 (CET)

[...] I. welcome it if the network called Voter Wiest for women refrain deprive Wikipedia, the staff and people with Wikipedia articles denigrating. These one-vote-accounts are anyway not much connected with broadsides against the applicant, the encyclopedic practices, and against public figures, they lose all credibility Greetings -. Logosorg

15:19, 27 January 2011 (CET)

[...]

Article RELEVANT. RESERVE. complete and in sequence. Why? Google spits out over 60,000 links to "Susan Wiest" from. I use Wikipedia to give me a quick overview of situations, persons and relevant links. In "my" wikipedia I would rather find too much than too little. ( not signed post by 84,227,238,197 (

talk) 11:40, 31 January 2011 (PST))

The petition is certainly relevant, the lady more, even if it has generated a corresponding, probably bad time limited media interest. The article In my view, therefore, to delete . - Hic et nunc

disk

WP: RM

14:20, 31 Jan. 2011 (CET)

deleted -

He3nry disc 8:58, 1st Feb. 2011 (CET) Reason: Follow the irrelevance argument. Relevant to the discussion on basic income and the petition, which is not the appropriate person and have the media attention. Met since the person is not the RK-consensus. - He3nry disc

8:58, 1st Feb. 2011 (CET)

That's not please you serious? I quote from the relevance criteria Wikipedia: "The person is known for its involvement in historical, political or other news worthy events." I ask the administrator who made the deletion disprove the reputation of the Susan Wiest in other news worthy events. Narichtenquellen: http://www.taz.de/1/leben/koepfe/artikel/1/probiert-doch-mal-das/ , http://www.welt.de/politik/bundestagswahl/article4589374/ How-Politikdebuetantin-Susanne-Wiest-fire fing.html , http://de.wikinews.org/wiki/Petition_Grundeinkommen:_Susanne_Wiest_bei_Maischberger , http://www.faz.net/s/RubA24ECD630CAE40E483841DB7D16F4211/Doc ~ ~ ~ ~ Ecommon E38140F17015D4F109866D5F902580BD9 ATpl Scontent.html , ^{http://www.welt.de/politik/article3228781/50-000-Stimmen-fuer-Grundeinkommen-fuer-alle.html to name a few. - Rosalie76} 10:23, 1st Feb. 2011 (CET)